Entries tagged reverse proxy

Related tags: c, caching, proxy.

That is it, I'm going to do it

Saturday, 22 March 2014

That's it, I'm going to do it: I have now committed myself to writing a scalable, caching, reverse HTTP proxy.

The biggest question right now is implementation language; obviously "threading" of some kind is required so it is a choice between Perl's anyevent, Python's twisted, Rubys event machine, or node.js.

I'm absolutely, definitely, not going to use C, or C++.

Writing a a reverse proxy in node.js is almost trivial, the hard part will be working out which language to express the caching behaviour, on a per type, and per-resource basis.

I will ponder.

| 12 comments.

 

Room for another reverse-proxy?

Friday, 17 September 2010

Like many people I use Apache's mod_proxy to proxy from *:80 to a bunch of servers running upon 127.0.0.1:XX.

(I've mentioned this too often; but in short I have a bunch of sites all running with thttpd under their own UID).

Why do I use apache soley as a reverse proxy, instead of pound, varnish, nginx, or lighttpd? After all it is pretty heavy-weight. Well the answer to that is that I have a bunch of mod_rewrite rules.

So I'm wondering, could I drop apache if I were to hack together a simple network proxy that would listen upon port 80, reading requests, and directing them to local servers? The answer to that is plainly "yes". There are many reverse-proxies around and writing them isn't hard.

So what would be the point? Imagine a reverse-proxy that understood mod_rewrite rules. That would rock.

In short we'd have to define three things:

  • Matching vhost name.
  • Destination to proxy to.
  • (Optionally) the mod_rewrite rules

Given something like this:

LISTEN 1.2.3.4:80

host example.net or host www.example.net
{
   #redirect traffic here
   proxy_to 127.0.0.1 1011

   RewriteRule /about /cgi-bin/index.cgi
}

When the proxy received an incoming request to http://example.net/about it would actually send the request /cgi-bin/index.cgi to the host 127.0.0.1:1011.

That seems neither too complex nor too impossible.

The hard part would be emulating mod_rewrite 100%. Especially chained requests. I would be willing to write the trivial version, but I suspect the full emulation would be a job of diminishing returns. Am I right?

ObSubject: You crossed the line first, sir. - "The Dark Knight"

| 9 comments.

 

Recent Posts

Recent Tags