Today my main machine was down for about 8 hours. Oops.
That meant when I got home, after a long and dull train journey, I received a bunch of mails from various hosts each saying:
- Failed to fetch slaughter policies from rsync://www.steve.org.uk/slaughter
Slaughter is my sysadmin utility which pulls policies/recipies from a central location and applies them to the local host.
Slaughter has a bunch of different transports, which are the means by which policies and files are transferred from the remote "central host" to the local machine. Since git is supported I've now switched my policies to be fetched from the master github repository.
- All my servers need git installed. Which was already the case.
- I can run one less service on my main box.
- We now have a contest: Is my box more reliable than github?
In other news I've fettled with lumail a bit this week, but I'm basically doing nothing until I've pondered my way out of the hole I've dug myself into.
Like mutt lumail has the notion of "limiting" the display of things:
- Show all maildirs.
- Show all maildirs with new mail in them.
- Show all maildirs that match a pattern.
- Show all messages in the currently selected folder(s)
- More than one folder may be selected :)
- Shall all unread messages in the currently selected folder(s).
Unfortunately the latter has caused an annoying, and anticipated, failure case. If you open a folder and cause it to only show unread messages all looks good. Until you read a message. At which point it is no longer allowed to be displayed, so it disappears. Since you were reading a message the next one is opened instead. WHich then becomes marked as read, and no longer should be displayed, because we've said "show me new/unread-only messages please".
The net result is if you show only unread messages and make the mistake of reading one .. you quickly cycle through reading all of them, and are left with an empty display. As each message in turn is opened, read, and marked as non-new.
There are solutions, one of which I documented on the issue. But this has a bad side-effect that message navigation is suddenly complicated in ways that are annoying.
For the moment I'm mulling the problem over and I will only make trivial cleanup changes until I've got my head back in the game and a good solution that won't cause me more pain.