I'm still in the middle of a quandry with regards to revision control.
90% of my open code is hosted via CVS at a central site.
I wish to migrate away from CVS in the very near future, and having ummed and ahhed for a while I've picked murcurial as my system of choice. There is extensive documentation, and it does everything I believe I need.
The close-runner was git, but on balance I've decided to choose mercurial as it wins in a few respects.
Now the plan. I have two options:
- Leave each project in one central site.
- Migrate project $foo to its own location.
Alternatively I could just leave the one site in place, ignoring the fact that the domain name is now inappropriate.
The problem? I can't decide which approach to go for. Both have plusses and minuses.
Suggestions or rationales welcome - but no holy wars on why any particular revision control system is best...
I guess ultimately it matters little, and short of mass-editing links its 50/50.